Author |
Message |
|
Rocky Marciano wrote:He just lost that title.
He chose not to defend (he had zero defenses) and boxed same guy over and over again. He just failed to realise that by losing his opponent was getting up in ranks (server was slow to update rankings).
I suppose he did not even realise that the last match was for the title. Well he lost it and his opponent ran with the title with no intention of defending it ever.
It's bullshit how I lost it, but atleast he doesn't have it anymore.
|
|
|
EDDIE54 wrote:juan manuel marquez.. why am i the only one who knows?
Probably because their names are displayed in the background.
|
|
|
Skillz wrote:Lol Nigel i certainly am not. I don't even play.
I didn't mean it that way...I'll explain.
B4 you and John did the Superchamp Unifying. People only considered you like 5. Than when you won that People immediatly put u at 1 (untill Fatny came back)
That's kinda what i mean.
Not so much as ur overrated but nobody is really overrated that i could think of and your the closest thing because of tht.
Ok, so beating Rocky twice row (2nd best here), Fatnt twice in a row, Boon in like 4 of the last 5, Captain America, Vargas, HTF means I'm rank 5?. I don't want to bang my own drum but I knw for a fact I'm higher.
Since the turn of the year I have won 23 titles and made 42 defences, more than you have managed probably in your entire career, who else here can say they have done that in 09, yet people still talk crap, not bothered by it though, I'll just keep knocking people out and let more jealousy come through.
Infact my list is as follows:
1)Fatny
2)Rocky
3)Black Bear
4)Me/Boxa
5)Viper/Captain
|
|
|
sterlihalla wrote:
Skillz wrote:
sterlihalla wrote:Most overrated - Nigel benn
Most underrated - Larry holmes
Agreed. No offense Nigel, your great but not number 2..
Nigels style doesnt work anymore now hes like a better version of red viper, i owned him magarito style today i jus ran through all his shots and stopped him hes not a very strong puncher which doesnt do him any favours and larry doesnt get the cred he deserves everyone just remembers larry losing to fatny and thats it.
Your lag was horrendous in both fights, but like many others you claim a great victory in terrible coniditions.
As for me being overated?, haven't you guys been looking at what people have been saying lately?, who here rates me?, I get continually bashed by everyone, now even Skillz thinks he can join in (can't see how he is in any position to talk but ok). How can I be overated when no one rates me at all?. I don't need to prove myself, a few sloppy losses here and their can't take away I have beaten some very impressive fighters over the years. I just knew Reaper would post here and get excited.
Overated: Reaper
Underated: Captain (this guy has awesome skills.)
|
|
|
This thread is now getting embarrasing.
|
|
|
HTF wrote:
Pinging onlineboxing.net [209.170.159.90] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.170.159.90: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 209.170.159.90:
Packets: Sent = 200, Received = 200, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 124ms, Average = 108ms
See thats now and I can fight on this just fine with out having problems but most of the time instead of it jumping to 124 MS it will jump to 160 like i said in others. Gotta be comcast and all the people using the net which I already figured just bugs me.
Thanks to your help I finally figured how to stop my computer taking a wireless connection. I also done this ping test and it showed no connection jumps!, just a solid 113-118, so hopefully when I fight no more skips, thanks HTF.
|
|
|
he came back and admitted to ducking, cheating shouldn't be allowed but hey.
Nigel Benn> You gonna give me my rm?
Judah> dissed me on the forum man
Nigel Benn> Which is why you am back
Nigel Benn> You deserved it
Nigel Benn> You won then ran
Judah> never was a champ before
Nigel Benn> That's not the point
Nigel Benn> I was owed a rm
Judah> in 2 years
Judah> and u shall get one
Judah> not now
|
|
|
Judah. For winning by Ko then running with no rematch. Damn things wasn't like this back when people like Donny, HTF, Larry, Unstop etc were playing.
|
|
|
Dick wrote:Congrats Benn, it seems you are better than you think you are.
Now step it up and face me or Viper ducker
Now for Viper.
|
|
|
Ray Johnson wrote:Lol this thread is actually embarrasing
Yeah I do feel kind of dirty...but fuck it, it's all good fun winding and getting wound up
By the way Boon I did fight Rocky, check it up.
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
Dick wrote:He probably wont Rocky. He told me Bear, Fatny and you beat him 10 out of 10 times. He admitted you are the better fighter, dont expect Benn to give you a shot any time soon.
Good god constant sniping, get over it and stop acting like some crazed angry stalker and Unlike you, I don't pad for defences, I fight everybody asshole.
Rocky, I have no problem with that, let's do this next time I'm on.
|
|
|
Arctic Blaze wrote:i dont think i have ever seen so much crying in my life.
this is like a bunch of babies crying over the new toy.
Oh like how you cried like this you mean:
http://onlineboxing.net/jforum/posts/list/2736.page
Hypocrisy at the highest order
|
|
|
Like I have said a million times before, it's down to how many people use the internet now. When I first got it back in 2000, I had a light speed connection and could do just about anything no problem, but as the years rolled by and the internet grew more popular, my connection got slower and slower especially at peak times.
When I first played this game late 2004, I had a ping of 85, it's now 125, my conncetion is awful after 6pm on weekdays and unplayable Sunday evenings, why?, because you have more people in the year 2009 sitting on their butts using the service providers bandwidth on 5 downloads at once, Xbox/Playstation online gaming and people just surfing. I can see this problem getting alot worse and like you HTF my connection skips I'm just getting sick of it, maybe it is the server, and the fact 3D is running off the same server? and as I mentioned probably also down to the popularity of the internet now.
I also think that because of the volume of people who now have internet, it now makes Mikkel's server outdated and he would possibly need a new one because my gaming problems are not bad when I play XBOX Live, but of course new servers are alot of money and Mikkel has done enough already without burning a hole in his pocket especially in this economic climate.
|
|
|
Professor wrote:Nigel you are an insecure coward. And your petty and irrelevant insults will do nothing to change that.
My definition of an insecure coward is someone who slags someone off for no reason (you), slags someone off for no reason behind a computer screen (you), uses other peoples wins, losses and moans against me to bitch back like a little school girl (you), so you see CLB, you are refelecting your own problems on someone else. You are a fool and a CLB and a typical Net guy who mouths off on here because they know in real life they wouldn't, they'd get their face broken. Now piss off you annoying little fly, I'm done with you too.
If I was a bum you wouldn't say shit, it's pure jealousy and insecurity, which is fine CLB, from now on I'll just ignore you.
|
|
|