sterlihalla wrote:what did he say?

HTF wrote:

Professor wrote:HOF is a joke anyway. Most good people aren't even in. If I was making a top 10 list based on skills half of them wouldnt even be on it.

What half wouldnt be in???


U never even fought many of the HOFERS during the time they were elected in.


I can name 2 maybe 3 that IMHO shouldnt be in other then that. its all good.



Lab
Tyson
Larry
Sal
MAB


How many of those people have you fought during there prime??? Ive fought them all and some I dislike at times but you cant denie the fact they at some point ruled OB.



right now HOF is a joke Mikkel is creating a new game and really no point in doing yearly elections right now


you should make a list of all the GOOD people you think should be in?


but I promise you that most of the HOFERS deserve to be in there.

HTF wrote:Leave it down. To many assholes. may sound shit to those who really do thank you Mikkel.


But those people who do will stay around and wait and maybe join up on 3d.


leave it down. thin out the childish little pricks.

Oscar wrote:Thought i'd share this

http://www.ferryhalim.com/orisinal/g3/bells.htm

So..so addicting

sterlihalla wrote:

goldenboy88 wrote:you might spar with guys 30+ pounds heavier then you but you have never sparred with headshots in your life.. and 20% body fat is shit my friend. im sitting at 4%

Im not talking about body fat i was talking about body mass and i do full contact sparring.
I have took headshots and gave shots of my own back but i do notice i mark easier when fighting heavier guys.

Stealth wrote:thats what i call a cocksucker

catfish2 wrote:

BoXa wrote:vs yacoob on form playing properly you would stand no chance

that's possible, yacoob fights like an idiot now.

and boxa i know you are just defending yacoob right now because you're sore at me. i apologize for fighting with you the last time we talked. you trained me into the fighter i am now, and i appreciate it, because i personally love my style, and no one else would take the time to train me.

so boxa, could we put our petty differences aside and call a truce? im sorry for being rude to you before.

Dark Destroyer wrote:

African Assassin wrote:After watching the fight over a second time i honestly thought bernard hopkins took calzaghe to school. He made him fight him fight landed the cleaner harder more eye catching shots slowed calslappy down big time kncked him down, bruised him, cut him, staggered him and WAS NEVER HURT and traded frequently with him... not bad for a 43 year old version of B-Hop. He was robbed twice after outboxing taylor and lost a close decision many thought he won including me to calslappy. It seems like the judges don't want hopkins to retire in peace.... anyways i think he will wait for the dawson tarver winner then dominate who ever of those two bums wins followed by roy "kid coma" jones and then retire in peace.

Compubox Stats:

Total punches thrown: Hopkins 468 Calaghe 707
Punches Landed: Hopkins 127 Calzaghe 232
PCT: Hopkins 27% Calzaghe 33%
Jabs Thrown: Hopkins 93 Calzaghe 224
Jabs Landed: Hopkins 11 Calzaghe 45
PCT: Hopkins 12% Calzaghe 20%
Power Punches Thrown: Hopkins 375 Calzaghe 483
Power Punches Landed: Hopkins 116 Calzaghe 187
PCT: Hopkins 31% Calzaghe 39%

Calzaghe also hit Hopkins more than anybody esle has in his entire career.

So based on FACTS please tell me where your biased opinion stacks up?. Calzaghe has yet again proven people wrong but of course some Americans won't accept a Euro fighter being great. Lennox Lewis also didn't get the respect he deserved.

I don't see how you can win a fight throwing a shot here and there cleaner shot or not then hold everytime Calzaghe tries to land a shot, the man was petrified like he was having a prime Tyson chraging at him. Fighting like a coward deserves a L on the record, his negative style also cost him against Taylor which I think is right.

You use the predictable age excuse, no one was saying he was old when he beat Tarver and Ronald Wright, it only becomes an issue when he loses to a brit right?. If he'd won it would have been called an outstanding achievement , so Calzaghe can't win. Hopkins looked in better condition than Calzaghe, if anything you could argue he was fitter.

Mikkel wrote:What amazes me about JC is not his ability to choose opponents not good enough to beat him or opponents good enough to beat him but too much over the hill.. It's his ability to make boxing look like crap, making every single one of his fights a total bore. Has anyone seriously seen a great fight with JC ?

You can use the Padded record about almost every boxer, it's also very rare for two great fighters to fight each other in their primes which is why Fraizier, Foreman and Ali's era was so great. Infact if you look at Hopkins, He beat a washed up Trinidad, Tarver and Oscar and lost to a prime Roy Jones and Taylor and If I'm not mistaken it was Hopkins negative tactics that made the match boring with his persistent holding. He also kept saying Calzaghe was a homeboy, never fought outside the UK and just how many times has he fought outside the US?,0.

You have never seen a exciting Calzaghe match?,you obviously haven't seen his matches against Eubank, Mitchell, Lacy and Woodhall. Just like every other boxer including Mayweather they have bad nights depending on the person they are fighting. I guarantee if Hopkins wanted a war Calzaghe would have duly obliged.